Bubble Reach · X layer open for partners

Eleven accounts
is not eleven opinions

A map of which accounts fund, follow and like together. A shape, never a verdict.

Wallet maps show you who funded whom. They cannot show you the part that actually moves a launch: the same group liking the same post, in the same four minutes, on every single one. Bubble Reach maps all three layers at once.

Three layersWallet maps only draw the first one

Coordination does not live in one place

01 · Wallets

Who funded whom, and who bought in the same block

The layer Bubblemaps made famous: clusters of addresses that share a funding source, move together, or enter within seconds of each other.

◈ The signalTwelve wallets funded from one address that all buy in the first two blocks is not twelve buyers.

Funding graph, first-transaction timing, overlap in holdings.

02 · X

Who keeps amplifying whom

The half that wallet maps cannot see. Accounts that structurally like, quote and reply to each other form a bubble whether or not their wallets touch.

◈ The signalThe same eleven accounts liking the same post within four minutes, on every launch, is a coordinated group — not eleven independent opinions.

Co-engagement over time: who appears together, how fast, and how often. Measured across launches, not on one post.

03 · Telegram

Where it starts before it is public

Shared group membership and synchronised posting. A call that appears in four groups in the same minute started in one of them.

◈ The signalOverlapping membership plus simultaneous posting is the clearest coordination signal there is.

Public and semi-public groups only, and only what a member could see. No private message content, ever.

The part everybody gets wrong

A bubble is a
shape, not a verdict

People in the same niche engage with each other. That is not coordination, that is a scene. A cluster graph is a beautiful way to accuse innocent people if you do not hold it with both hands — so the reading rules matter as much as the measurement.

  • A bubble is not an accusation

    People who work in the same niche naturally engage with each other. Overlap is normal. What is not normal is overlap that is fast, total and identical across every launch.

  • The strength is in repetition, not in one post

    One shared like means nothing. The same group, in the same order, within the same minutes, across five unrelated launches is the finding.

  • Exclusion is the strongest signal of all

    When a bubble suddenly stops amplifying one of its own, that is the group telling you something it will never say publicly. One account dropped is one bad actor. The whole bubble going quiet is a different problem.

  • Standing moves with the bubble

    A partner whose reach turns out to be mostly their own bubble is not a fraud — but their delivery will not match what a project expected, and that lands on their record like any other missed term.

What we will not do with itWritten before the first measurement, on purpose

The limits come first

This is the most dangerous thing on this site to build carelessly. These four rules were written down before the first account was ever measured, so they cannot be quietly relaxed later when a finding is exciting.

  • 01Only public data. Public posts, public likes, public group membership — nothing that required an account to be tricked into showing it.
  • 02No name appears in a published bubble without the same standard as a case file: shown, dated, and re-checkable by the reader.
  • 03A cluster is published as a shape, never as a verdict. The reader draws the conclusion, and the method is printed next to it.
  • 04Any partner can see their own bubble before anyone else does, and can respond on the record.
For projects, and for partners who want their own picture first

Bubble Reach

See the group behind the account

Open now

Coordination mapped across three layers at once — wallets, X and Telegram — so you can tell a real audience from a room of the same eleven accounts.

  • Wallet clusters: shared funding, synchronised entries, overlapping holdings.
  • X co-engagement: who amplifies whom, how fast, and whether it repeats across unrelated launches.
  • Telegram overlap: shared groups and simultaneous posting, from public and semi-public rooms only.
  • Every partner sees their own map before anyone else does, and can respond on the record.

Where it stopsA bubble is a shape, never a verdict — people in the same niche naturally engage with each other, and we will not let a graph do the accusing. Nothing about a named account gets published without the same standard as a case file: shown, dated, and re-checkable by you.

Start today

Open for partners on the roster, X layer only: who comes back across your posts, and how fast — sent to you privately, before anyone else sees it. The wallet and Telegram layers are not built yet; projects stay on the list for those.

Ask for your own map

We reply to this address, and use it for nothing else.

For example a launch you want the map to cover. One line is enough.

or email hello@proofofreach.xyz
What next
◈ Next

What it is built against

Bought followers priced as reach, and the five other patterns.

◇ Next

The partners today

Every account checked and dated, with the record on the card.

◇ Next

Seen a bubble?

Send the handles and what you noticed. Screenshots and hashes welcome.

Adds the three layers it reads, how to read a bubble, and the limits we hold it to.

Find a voiceStart a deal