DustyBC
@DustyBC · Culture · Macro · record rec_7cdf09
Everything this site says about this person, and the reason each line is allowed to be here. Where we have not checked something ourselves, it says so — that is the whole point of the page.
Confirmation
2 of 4 checkable claims confirmed by us. What we deliberately do not publish is listed below with the reason, and is left out of the fraction rather than counted against this person.
Account last checked 2026-09-09 · leeft · ledger run 2026-09-09
Where the number comes from
Three axes, each worked out from the records on this page. Change a record and the number moves; there is no field anywhere in our data where a score could be written by hand.
- Chain
- not stated
- Rate band
- on request
Manual score · not analytics
- Trust55
Recorded with a date, but it arrived outside the account, so it does not prove ownership.
How hard the permission is proven: recorded with a date, and sent from the account itself.
- Freshness100
We read the profile today.
How recently we read the profile ourselves. Full marks on the day of the check, nothing left after 30 days.
- Deliverynot measured
No campaign has run yet, so there is nothing measured to show.
Of the posts agreed in a campaign, how many arrived with proof. Empty until a first campaign has run.
The number above is the average of the axes that have a value. An axis with nothing to measure is left out entirely rather than counted as a zero — a person who has not run a campaign with us yet is not a person who failed to deliver. Nothing here comes from a follower count or any other public metric.
This person agreed, in writing, to appear on this roster
Confirmed by us · 2026-09-09
They said yes in a signed form. That message is kept, and this card points at it.
A card without a recorded permission and a date cannot be published — the roster refuses to go out with one missing.
The account @DustyBC exists and is not suspended
Confirmed by us · 2026-09-09
We opened the profile page and it carried the handle: “DustyBC Crypto (@DustyBC) / X”.
We read the profile page itself, not the status code. A suspended profile still answers like a healthy one, so only the page content settles it.
Check it yourselfThe person who agreed is the owner of that account
Their word · 2026-09-09
The yes arrived through a signed form, which sits outside the account. We are taking their word that the two are the same person.
A yes sent from the account itself proves ownership. Any other route does not, and is labelled here as their word.
They cover Culture, Macro
Their word · 2026-09-09
Read off their own public profile description, in their own words. They did not fill in a form for this, and we did not audit their timeline against it — so it is their word, not our finding.
The list of niches is fixed, so the same word means the same thing on every card. Free text is not accepted.
Check it yourselfWhat they will never promote
Deliberately not published
They set this line when they joined. We do not publish it here, because it is theirs to state — you are told what it rules out before an introduction is made.
Held on file and checked against every brief before we forward it. Nothing that crosses this line is ever brought to them.
Audience size and engagement rate
Deliberately not published
Follower counts are bought daily in this market, and neither of us can tell a bought one from a real one from the outside. At the introduction they show you their own analytics, which is the only version worth anything.
No audience figure is stored anywhere on this site, so there is nothing here to inflate.
We checked this ourselves. The method and the date are printed next to it.
They told us and we wrote it down. We have not independently verified it, and we say so.
We could print a number here. We do not, because we cannot verify it — and an unverifiable number would devalue everything on this page that is verified.
It is not a rating, and there is no opinion in it anywhere. Every line above is either something we checked with a named method on a named day, or something we are openly taking on their word. If you think a line is wrong, the method is printed next to it so you can prove us wrong — and we would rather hear that than not.
This person can have their card removed the same day they ask, without giving a reason. Back to the roster →
Request an intro
Tell us you want to reach DustyBC. We ask them first, and you hear back within two working days.
◇ NextFind someone similar
Filter the roster by niche and chain, and sort by how hard each permission is proven.
◇ NextWhy this page exists
The scams this record is built against, and what we do about each one.